But how bad it is? we need to setup a synthetic benchmark to find out.
My configuration is Oracle database 12.1, Linux 6.4, 64bit, on my laptop virtual box.
There are 2 database servers in one data center. To query remote table through database link.
5000 rows table t2, copy data from view all_objects.
Here is the benchmark results:
- 1 rows, query 1000 times.
6.39 seconds v.s. 0.02 seconds. 10M network.
1.09 seconds v.s. 0.02 seconds. 100M network.
- 1000 rows, row by row fetch v.s. bulk fetch. 100M network.
0.44 seconds : 0 seconds.
So the network latency is between 0.00044 and 0.0011 seconds per round trip.
For example, we have a system process 300 orders per second, run 300 SQL SELECT, 33% time are used for network.
It is considerable amount of time.
Here is the benchmark test setup, so you can reproduce it on your servers.
tnsnames.ora:
mac=
(description=
(address=(protocol=tcp)(host=192.168.1.104)(port=1521))
(connect_data=(service_name=pdb1)))
drop public database link dev1_link;
create public database link dev1_link
connect to scott
identified by abc
using 'mac';
drop public database link dev1_link;
create public database link dev1_link
connect to scott
identified by abc
using 'local';
drop table t2 purge;
create table t2 as select * from all_objects where 1=0;
-- Test 1, remove v.s. local database,
set serveroutput on
declare
l_cnt number;
li number;
g_run1 number;
begin
l_cnt := 1000;
g_run1 := dbms_utility.get_time; --This function determines the current time in 100th's of a second.
for i in 1..l_cnt
loop
select count(*) into li from t2@dev1_link where rownum < 1;
end loop;
g_run1 := (dbms_utility.get_time-g_run1);
dbms_output.put_line( 'remote query ran in '||g_run1);
g_run1 := dbms_utility.get_time;
for i in 1..l_cnt
loop
select count(*) into li from t2 where rownum < 1;
end loop;
g_run1 := (dbms_utility.get_time-g_run1);
dbms_output.put_line( 'local query ran in '||g_run1);
end;
/
remote query ran in 105
local query ran in 1
set autot on
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
0 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
541 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
543 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed
.
-- Test 2, Bulk Fetch, both from remote db,
drop table t2 purge;
create table t2 as select * from all_objects;
set serveroutput on
declare
l_cnt number;
li number;
g_run1 number;
cursor c1 is select * from t2@dev1_link where rownum <= 1000;
lr1 c1%rowtype;
type tab1 is table of c1%rowtype;
lt1 tab1;
begin
l_cnt := 1000;
g_run1 := dbms_utility.get_time; --This function determines the current time in 100th's of a second.
open c1;
loop
fetch c1 into lr1;
exit when c1%notfound;
end loop;
g_run1 := (dbms_utility.get_time-g_run1);
dbms_output.put_line( 'remote query ran in '||g_run1);
g_run1 := dbms_utility.get_time;
fetch c1 bulk collect into lt1;
g_run1 := (dbms_utility.get_time-g_run1);
dbms_output.put_line( 'local query ran in '||g_run1);
end;
/
remote query ran in 44
local query ran in 0
Let me know your benchmark results, the ball park.
Thanks,
Charlie | Database Architect Developer
1 comment:
100M network
--1 rows, query 1000 times.
remote query ran in 68
local query ran in 3
--1000 rows, row by row fetch v.s. bulk fetch
remote query ran in 26
local query ran in 0
Post a Comment